Back to Legal Updates

Orphan objects of copyright (neighbouring rights)

legal updates
22 / 08 / 2024
On 22 July 2024, Federal Law No. 190-FZ “On Amendments to Part Four of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation” dated 22 July 2024 (“Law”) was adopted, establishing the legal regulation of “orphan” works.

The Law will enter into force on 21 October 2024.

Objective of the law

Orphan works are works protected by copyright, but whose authors or other right holders are assumed to be unknown. In practice, for a long time the question remained open as to whether it was possible to obtain permission to use an orphan work in the absence of any identifying features of the author (right holder).

The Law regulates the procedure for using objects of copyright and neighbouring rights, where the authors or other right holders are unknown.

New provisions

The Law applies only to the following objects of copyright and neighbouring rights:

  • works of literature, fine arts, decorative and applied arts
  • photographic works
  • works obtained by means similar to photography
  • musical works (with or without text)
  • phonograms
  • performances
For an object to be recognised “orphan”, one of the following criteria must be met:

  • the name of the author (right holder) is not established; or
  • the name of the author (right holder) is established, but there is no information about the place of residence of the citizen or the address of the legal entity, which allows the sending of legally significant communications.
Procedure for using “orphan” objects:

  • an “orphan” intellectual property object, as a rule, cannot simply be used without applying to the organisation for rights management on a collective basis;
  • it is obligatory to take appropriate measures to identify the author or other right holder and/or his/her residence and location;
  • the content of the application of a person claiming to use an object of copyright or neighbouring rights is determined, including information on the measures taken by the applicant to find the author or other right holder;
  • a mandatory list of such measures is defined, ranging from recourse to open sources of information to a search of library and archive collections;
  • the accredited organisation must verify the content of the application of the person claiming to use the “orphan” object;
  • a period of 90 business days is established from the date of placing an announcement on the search for the author or other right holder on the official website of the accredited organisation, during which time the author may still be “found”.
Therefore, the Law establishes a large number of different guarantees so that everyone can be sure that the author is really unknown.

At the level of by-laws, new regulation may appear, providing, among other things:

  • requirements for the composition of information in the application of the interested party;
  • requirements for the list of measures to search for the right holder;
  • list of information systems and other sources to be used for the search.

Permissible use

In order to use an “orphan” object, the interested party must carry out a full “investigation” to confirm whether the intellectual property object may be recognised as being “orphan”, and an accredited collective rights management organisation (CRMO) must cross-check the results of that investigation.

Subject to receiving an “orphan” designation, the interested party may be granted the right to use the object under a royalty-free, non-exclusive licence. The relevant usage fee will be credited to a nominal account, which accredited CRMOs are responsible for.

Once a licence has been granted, “orphan” objects may only be used in the following ways:

  • reproduction, including making a copy;
  • distribution by selling a copy or other disposal;
  • making it available to the public.
Processing and using “orphan” objects in another manner not provided for by the Law is not allowed.

Controversial provisions of the law

Rights holders who wish to remain anonymous or use pseudonyms may face the risk of having their works recognised as “orphan” works. It is still unclear how exactly the requirement to try to establish “information on the place of residence in relation to a citizen” will be implemented in practice, given that the Constitution guarantees the inviolability of private life and the legislation on personal data classifies such information as personal data, the free dissemination of which is prohibited.

Recommendations

It is recommended that right holders, especially those who are anonymous or operating under a pseudonym, periodically check the status of their objects in order to avoid them being recognised as “orphan” works.
Subscribe